Economics and Rural Development, Volume 2, Number 1

LIMITATION OF QUALITY COST MODELS IN AGRICULTURE

Vilija Aleknevičienė, Povilas Vanagas

Abstract

Globalization of markets increases competitiveness in agricultural sector, so the companies and farms need to improve quality management and be able to estimate efficiency of this process. The efficiency depends on total quality costs, which have some par­ticularities in agriculture comparable with other sectors of industry. There are two main results from this research. The first result is the identification of particularities of quality costs in agriculture. Some of failure costs are influenced by natural, climate and bio­logical factors and are uncontrollable. For better quality costs management considering these factors the authors suggest to deploy internal and external failure costs into control­lable and uncontrollable ones. The second result is proving that earlier developed quality cost models (QCM) have the limited value in agriculture. “Force major” makes more complicated the decisions making of quality costs management and link­ing towards minimum total quality costs. Moreover, these models are focused on the cost of optimal quality level and ignore changes of revenue. Efficiency of quality improve­ment process should be estimated by quality costs to sales revenue ratio. 

Keyword(s): quality, costs, non-conformance, models, improvement


References

Aleknevičienė V., Vanagas P. (2004). The Problems of Qual-ity Cost Identification in Agricul¬tural and Food Industry. Proceedings of the Interna¬tional Scientific Conference: Possibilities for Rural Development in the Enlarged Europe (Jelgava), pp. 154–160.

Brust P. J., Gryna F. M. (2002). Quality and Economics: Links include nations’ growth, export advantages and improved living standards. Quality Progress, October, pp. 64–69.

Campanella J. (1999). Principles of Quality Costs (Visconsin, American Society for Quality).

Deming W. E. (1986). Out of Crisis (Cambridge, MA: MIT Centre for Advanced Engineering Study).

Feigenbaum A. V. (2001). How to Manage for Quality in Today’s Economy: quantifying the costs of quality – including failure costs – is the key to profitability and sales growth. Quality Progress, May, pp. 26–27.

Freiesleben J. (2004a). How Better Quality Af¬fects Pricing. Quality Progress, February, pp. 48–52.

Freiesleben J. (2004b). On the Limited Value of Cost of Quality Models. Total Quality Management, 15 (7), pp. 959–969.

Hahn G. J., Doganaksoy N., Hoerl R. (2000). The Evolution of Six Sigma. Quality Engineering, 12 (3), pp. 317–326.

Juran J. M. (1951). Juran’s Quality Handbook (New York, McGraw-Hill).

Juran J. M., Gryna F. M. (1993). Quality Plan¬ning and Analysis (New York, McGraw-Hill).

Kondo Y. (1989). Human Motivation (Tokyo, 3A Corpora-tion).

Mukhopadhyay A.R. (2004). Estimation of Cost of Quality in an Indian Textile Industry for Reducing Cost of Non-conformance. Total Quality Manage¬ment & Business Excel-lence, 15(2), pp. 229-234.

Neuscheler-Fritsch D., Norris R. (2001). Cap¬turing Financial Benefits from Six Sigma. Quality Progress, May, pp. 39–44.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Economics and Rural Development ISSN 1822-3346 / eISSN 2345-0347

This journal is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License. Responsible editors: Prof. Dr Vilija Alekneviciene, Dr Gunita Mazure.