Economics and Rural Development, Volume 6, Number 1

ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF DECOUPLING ON THE BEHAVIOUR OF DAIRY FARMERS IN LITHUANIA

Antanas Karbauskas
Lithuanian University of Agriculture

Abstract

This paper is based on the MSc thesis report which investigates the potential impact of decoupling of CAP and national payments on the production behaviour of Lithuanian dairy farmers. The author argues that the impact of decoupling on the farm production in Lithuania can differ from that in the old EU member states. Mainly that is related to the phasing-in of CAP payments, a non-binding quota, and the unique qualities of Lithuanian agriculture, dairy farming in particular. The thesis hypothesis is that the direct impact of de-coupling on the farm production in Lithuania is negligible whereas the indirect positive impact incurred through farm investments is sig-nificant. A farm survey was conducted to research the topic. The design of the questionnaire survey is based on the economic theory which serves as a background and a theoretical justification for the study. Thirty-one farmers with six or more cows per farm were inter-viewed. The analysis of the survey results confirms the thesis hypothesis. Here, the key outcome of the research is that the potential posi-tive impact of decoupling on the farm production is possible in the long-run due to on-farm investments. Other interesting findings high-light that the capital constraint does not prevent farmers from making investments that farmers are apprehensive about the future quota constraints, even though currently the quota is not binding, i.e. no super-levy for overproduction is imposed, and that the milk quota seems to have a more likely impact on the farm production than decoupling. It should be noted that the research results apply to the sam-ple of the interviewed farmers. However, the research gives a good insight into the dairy farming in Lithuania as a whole and the poten-tial impact of the EU policies on the economic behaviour of the farmers. Furthermore, the research suggests how to improve the existing questionnaire that was used to interview the farmers, i.e. what questions should be asked and which areas require a stronger focus. Fur-thermore, suggestions for research topics in the future are made basing on the research findings.

Keyword(s): Decoupling, Milk quota, Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), Dairy farms, Farmers’ behavior


References

Burfisher, M.E., and Hopkins, J. (2004). “Decoupled payments in a changing policy setting”, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington DC, available at:

http://www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/aer838/aer838b.pdf” (accessed: 19/07/07).

Burrell, A. (2007). “Advanced Econometrics” lectures notes, unpublished, Wageningen University, Wageningen.

Consortium INRA – University of Wageningen (2002). “Study on the impact of future options for the Milk Quota system and the common market organisation for milk and milk products“, A study for the European Commission, available at:

http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/publi/reports/milkquota/inrawag_en.pdf (accessed: 25/10/07).

EC, (European Commission), (2006). “Milk and milk products in the European Union“, Brussels, available at:

http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/publi/fact/milk/2007_en.pdf (accessed: 12/08/08).

EC, (European Council), (2003). Council Regulation No. 1782/2003: “Establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers” and amending Regulations (EEC) No 2019/93, (EC) No 1452/2001, (EC) No 1453/2001, (EC) No 1454/2001, (EC) 1868/94, (EC) No 1251/1999, (EC) No 1254/1999, (EC) No 1673/2000, (EEC) No 2358/71 and (EC) No 2529/2001, Official Journal L 270, clause 95: milk quota, p. 0001 – 0069, available at:

http://www3.lrs.lt/pls/inter1/dokpaieska.showdoc_l?p_id=40249&p_query=&p_tr2=2 (accessed: 21/11/07).

Field, A. (2005). “Discovering statistics using SPSS”, Monograph, 2nd edition, London, p. 219 – 221, 640.

Greene, W. H. (2003). “Econometric analysis”, 5th Edition, New York University, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, p 720 –723.

Hair, J.F. (2006). “Multivariate Data Analysis”, Monograph, 6th Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, p. 102 – 133, 189 – 204.

Heerink, N. (2008). “How Distortive is Direct Income Support to Farmers? Evidence from Rural China”, available at:

http://www.clustereconomics.wur.nl/NR/rdonlyres/FB9C7160-2697-4FFD-A608-FCF38168CB4E/67631/HeerinketalClusterSeminarsept2008.pdf (accessed: 25/04/09).

Jongeneel, R. (2003). “Effective prices” analytical device to analyze the impact of the Agenda 2000 and Mid-Term Review policy reforms on dairy and beef: measurement and simulation results for Germany”, Agrarwirtschaft, 52(7), pp. 315–325.

József, I. (2005). “CAP: Direct Support Schemes“, European Commission, DG Agriculture and Rural Development, Brussels, available at:

Vol.6, No. 1, Economics and Rural Development 2010 ISSN 1822-3346

http://www.abgs.gov.tr/tarama/tarama_files/11/SC11EXP_CAP%20SAPs%20etc.pdf (accessed: 26/05/09).

Kriščiukaitienė, I. (2004). “The impact of the CAP reform on the Lithuanian milk sector in medium-perspective (till 2008)”, Vilnius, available at:

http://www.euro.lt/documents/poveikio_tyrimai/2004/BZUP_reforma_galutine_lt.pdf (accessed: 14/09/08).

Krugman P., Wells, R., and Graddy, K. (2008). “Economics”, European Edition, Monograph, New York, p.163 – 185.

LDS, (Lithuanian Department of Statistics), (2007). General statistical information about agriculture in Lithuania, Vilnius, available at:

http://www.stat.gov.lt/lt/pages/view/?id=1121 (accessed: 02/07/07).

LEI, (Institute of the Agricultural Economics Research), (2009). Database on agriculture and horticulture in the Netherlands, The Hague, available at:

http://www3.lei.wur.nl/BIN_ASP/show.exe?aktie=vindtoon&bj=2005&ej=2008&language=US&Valuta=2&publicatieID=3&kiestabel=2.08&Database=LTC (accessed: 14/04/09).

LMA, (Lithuanian Ministry of Agriculture), (2008). The directive No. 3D-230, 22 of April, 2008: “Regulations about the decoupled complementary national direct payments for milk in 2008”, Vilnius, available at:

http://www.zum.lt/zumn/documents/isakymu-priedai/080422-3D-230.pdf (accessed: 14/09/08).

Mikelionyte, D. (2007). “Structural changes in the Lithuanian milk sector and reasons for changes in the

context of the common EU market”, LAEI (Institute of Agrarian Economics of Lithuania), Vilnius, available at:

www.laei.lt/konf_070327/ppt/Mikelionyte.pdf (accessed: 07/05/08).

Perloff, J., Wells, R., and Graddy, K. (2007). “Microeconomics”, Fourth edition, University of California, Berkeley, p. 178, 222 – 226.

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., and Thornhill, A. (2003). “Research Methods for Business Students”, third edition, Harlow [etc.]: Financial Times/Prentice Hall; p. 364 – 387, 387 – 364.

State company “The centre of agricultural information and of rural business” (2007). The time-series data on the number of farms holdings keeping at least one milking cow in Lithuania, obtained by the request of the author, Vilnius.

Terwan, P. (2008). “After the Common Agricultural Policy: towards an EU policy for Sustainable Food and Rural Environment?“, Discussion paper, CLM Centre for Agriculture and Environment, Paul Terwan research & consultancy and Alterra / Wageningen UR, Wageningen.

Varian, H. (1996), “Intermediate Microeconometrics”, Fourth edition, University of California at Berkeley, p. 220 - 224, 317 – 330, 365 – 380.

Verbeek M. (2008). “A Guide to Modern Econometrics”, 3rd Edition, RSM Erasmus University, Rotterdam, p. 220 – 223


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Economics and Rural Development ISSN 1822-3346 / eISSN 2345-0347

This journal is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License. Responsible editors: Prof. Dr Vilija Alekneviciene, Dr Gunita Mazure.