Economics and Rural Development, Volume 8, Number 1


Viktorija Zaluksne, Baiba Rivza
Latvia University of Agriculture


The majority of the urban areas in Latvia are particularly small towns. They are not significant industrial or knowledge hubs or regional
development centres, and this condition prompts the question, in what way they could develop. In accordance with the urban hierarchy
approach, urban network creation and specialisation development could provide development of these towns.
This paper focuses on two aims. Firstly, to research the theoretical basis of polycentrism and the two concepts of polycentrism: the manydevelopment
centres concept and urban network concept. Secondly, to analyse urban network creation and development opportunities in the
small towns of Zemgale.
The authors have collected theoretical cognitions on polycentrism concepts developed by different scientists. The authors have also
analysed the smallest towns in Zemgale to gain perspective on the cooperation possibilities of these towns.
The following generally accepted scientific methods have been used for the development of the present paper: survey of scientific literature,
methods of SWOT analysis, and pair analysis. The factors selected from the SWOT analysis are grouped according to the following criteria:
socio-economic and financial factors, infrastructure factors, and political factors.
The theoreticians are united in the idea that the smaller a town is the straighter specialisation it needs for successful development. Hence,
specialisation development provides cooperation and promotes urban networking. Cooperation between small towns in Zemgale was not
observed at that time. There were several sporadic collaborative projects between towns but they were not characterised as a strong trend.
On the contrary, these collaborative projects indicate that municipalities are interested in developing this opportunity and in the future, this
cooperation may transform into full value urban networks. The article comprises 3 tables and 10 figures.

Keyword(s): polycentrism concepts, urban network, Zemgale


Aguilera A., Mignot D. (2004). Urban Sprawl,

Polycentrism and Commuting: A Comparison of Seven

French Urban Areas. Urban Public Economics Review,

Vol. 1, pp. 93-113.

Akniste local government (2010). Review of implemented

projects in 2010. Available at: http://www.akniste.


Auce local government (2010). Implemented projects

review in 2010. Available at:


Batten D. (1995). Network Cities: Creative Urban

Agglomerations for the 21st Century. Urban studies

Vol. 32, Is. 2, pp. 313 – 327.

Duranton G., Puga D. (2003). Microfoundations of Urban

Agglomeration Economies. Handbook of Regional and

Urban Economics, Vol. 4, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

European Commission. (2007). European Urban Audit.

Executive report. Available at:



Jaunjelgava local government (2010). Review of

implemented projects in 2010. Available at: http://www.

Kilis R., Kalsons G. (2008). Latvijas pilsetu

socialekonomiskas attistibas tendencies (Trends of

Social and Economic Development of Latvian Cities).

Research Report, SIA Analitisko petijumu un strategiju


Krugman P. (1994). Urban Concentration: the Role of

Increasing Returns and Transport Costs. Proceedings of

the “World Bank Annual Conference on Development

Economics 1994”, New York, pp. 241-277.

Meijers E. (2007). Urban Amenities in a Network of

Cities: Does Summing Small Cities Make a Large City?

Proceedings of the International Conference “Sustainable

Urban Areas”, European Network for Housing Research,

pp. 1-19.

Meijers E., Hoekstra J., Aguado R. (2008). Strategic

Planning for City Networks; the Emergence of a Basque

“Global City”? International Planning Vol. 13, Is. 3,

pp. 239 – 259.

Meijers E., Sandberg K. (2006). Polycentric Development

to Combat Regional Disparities? The Relation between

Polycentrism and Regional Disparities in European

Countries. Proceedings of the European Regional Science

Association conference papers, Delft University of

Technology, pp. 287-309.

Ministry of Regional Development and Local

Government (2011). Policentriska attistiba Latvija

nakotnes kohezijas politikas konteksta. Available at:

Ministry of Transport (2011). Konsultacijas materials

par elektronisko sakaru optiska tika “Videja judze”

infrastrukturas izveides projektu. Available at: http://

Oort F., Burger M., et al. (2009). On the Economic

Foundation of the Urban Network Paradigm: Spatial

Integration, Functional Integration and Economic

Complementarities within the Dutch Randstad.

Report series, Department of Economic Geography,

Utrecht University and Netherlands Institute for

Spatial Research.

Pessoa R. (2009). Towards a Definition of Urban

Polycentrism for Brasilian Metropolises. Proceedings

of the 4th International Conference of the International

Forum on Urbanism (IFoU) “The New Urban

Question – Urbanism beyond Neo-Liberalism 2009”,

Delft University of Technology, pp. 1003-1014.

Plavinas local government (2010). Review of implemented

projects in 2010. Available at:


State Joint Stock Company “Latvian State roads” (2011).

Valsts celu uzturesanas limenis. Available at: http://www.

State Regional Development Agency (2010). Regionu

attistiba Latvija 2009. Available at:


Taubenbock H., Esch T. et al. (2006). An Urban

Classification Approach Based on an Object Oriented

Analysis of High Resolution Satellite Imagery for a

Spatial Structuring within Urban areas. Proceedings

of the 1st EARSeL Workshop of the “SIG Urban

Remote Sensing 2006”, Humboldt-University in Berlin,

pp. 1-8.

Veneri P., Burgalassi D. (2010). Questioning Polycentric

Development and its Effects. Issues of Definition

and Measurement for the Italian NUTS 2 Regions.

Dipartimento di Economia, Universitą Politecnica delle


Viesite local government (2010). Review of implemented

projects in 2010. Available at:


Full Text: PDF


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Economics and Rural Development ISSN 1822-3346 / eISSN 2345-0347

This journal is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License. Responsible editors: Prof. Dr Vilija Alekneviciene, Dr Gunita Mazure.