Economics and Rural Development, Volume 9, Number 1

Assessment of the Amount of Greenhouse Gases in Biogas Production in Latvia

Kaspars Naglis – Liepa, Modrite Pelse
Latvia University of Agriculture; Latvia University of Agriculture,


The provision of energy, its availability and sufficiency at economically justified costs are the issues of economic growth, life quality, and security for any country. The factor of life quality and security is closely related to a clean environment that does not threaten human health. One of the indicators for assessing the surrounding environment is emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs). GHGs play a significant role in the energy sector, including producing energy from agricultural crops. Agriculture is a significant producer of greenhouse gases, therefore, if advancing towards sustainable development, it is important to reduce emissions of green-house gases both in agriculture and in the entire national economy. Not only production of greenhouse gases, but also their reduction through photosynthesis is specific to agriculture.
By successfully managing the factors causing the greenhouse gas effect, it is possible to substantially reduce emissions of harm-ful gases, especially if energy is produced from renewable sources. The aim of the present paper is to calculate a GHG balance and compare it with the amount of CO2 absorbed through photosynthesis as well as a fossil fuel comparator.

Keyword(s): greenhouse gas emissions, biogas, renewable energy, photosynthesis


Adamovics A., Dubrovskis V., Plume I., Jansons A., Lazdi-na D., Lazdins A. (2009) Biomasas izmantošanas kritēriju pielietošana un pasākumu izstrāde. (Criteria for Exploitation of Biomass and Measures) VSIA Vides projekti, Rīga, /in latvian/

Biograce. (2011) BioGrace – List of Additional Standart Values.

Cacho J. O. (1999) Dynamic Models, Externalities and Sus-tainability inAgriculture, Working Paper Series in Agriculu-ral and Resource Economics. No. 99-4. April, 1999. ISSN 1442 1909

Carvajal Micaela. (2012) Inestigation into CO2 Absorption of the Most Representative Agricultural Crops of the Re-gion of Murcia. CSIC. Pieejams:

Chianese D.S., Rotz. C.A., Richard T.L. (2009) „Simulation of Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Dairy Farms to Assess Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategies”. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. Vol.52 (4) pp:1301-1312 ISSN 0001-2351

DEFRA, (2012) Guidance on Measuring and Reporting Greenhaouse Gas (GHG) Emissions from Freight Transport Operations. Department for Environment Food and Affairs. UK.2012.

Dick J., Smith P., Smith R., Lilly A., Moxey A., Booth J., Campbell J., Campbell, C., Coulter D. (2008) Calculating farm Scale Greenhouse Gas Emissions. C PLAN, University of Aberden, The Macaulay Institute, Pareto Consulting. June. 2008.

EC. (2007) Eiropas Komisija. „Labākie pieejamie tehniskie paņēmieni neorganisko pamatvielu – amonjaka, skābju un minerālmēslu ražošanai” EK.2007. gada augusts

Ecoinvent Centre (2007). Ecoinvent data V2.0. Ecoinvent report No. 1-25, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dūbendorf, 2007.

Environment Canada. (2012) Emission Factors from Cana-da’s GHG Inventory. Fuel Combustion.

European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. (2009) Electricity Emission Factors Review. MWH S.p.A. November pieejams: skatīts:22.03.2012

GHG emisions in Latvia (2012)

Greenfiniti. (2012) Carbon Calculators. Calculation Meth-od.

Heal Geoffrey, (2009) The Economics of Renewable Ener-gy. Working Paper. National Bureau of Economic Research. June. avalaible:

Hillier J., Walter C., Malin D., Garcia-Suarez T., Mila-i-Canals Llorenc. (2011) A Farm-Focused Calculator for Emissions from Crop and Livestock Production. Environ-mental Modelling & Software, Vol. 26, pp. 1070–1078.

Huang W. M., Lee G. W.M. (2008). GHG Emissions, GDP Growth and Kyoto Protocol: A Revisit of Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis. Energy Policy, Vol. 36, Issue 1, pp. 239–247.

IFA. (2012) Fertilizer Use and Emissions in Agriculture. Availa-ble:

IPCC. (2012). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. United Nations Environment Programe (UNEP), World Me-teorological Organization (WMO).

Kalnins A. (2009) Biogazes razosanas saimnieciskie ie-guvumi (Economic Benefits of Biogas Production). Bie-driba „Zalais virziens”, Riga. ISBN 978-9984-39-887-7.

Milciuviene S., Milcius D., Praneviciene B., (2006) To-wards Hydrogen Economy in Lithuania. International Jour-nal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 31, Issue 7, June, pp. 861–866.

Ministry of Economics. Report of progress Directive for 2009/28EC . Ekonomikas ministrijas ziņojums saskaņā ar direktīvas 2009/28/EK 19.pantu. EM. (2010).

Moriarty P., Honnery D. (2009) Hydrogen’s Role in an Un-certain Energy Future. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 34, Issue 1, January, pp. 31–39.

Smith K. Bouwman L., Braatz B. (2000) „N20: Direct Emissions from Agricultural Soil. Good Practice and Uncer-tainity in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.” IPCC.

Weber M. E., Cuellar A. D. (2008) Cow Power: The Energy and Emissions of converting manure to biogas. Envioron. Res. Lett. 3 (July-September) pieejams:

Wesseler J. (2004) Monopolistic Pricing Power for Transgenetic Crops when Technology Adopters Face Irre-versible Benefits and Costs. Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 11, Issue 15, pp. 969–973.

Full Text: PDF


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Economics and Rural Development ISSN 1822-3346 / eISSN 2345-0347

This journal is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License. Responsible editors: Prof. Dr Vilija Alekneviciene, Dr Gunita Mazure.