CASE STUDY OF THE ACCOUNTING POLICY FORMATION AT AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS IN LITHUANIA
The article provides a brief overview of the normative and positive accounting in relation to profit increase/decrease. In order to meet the aim of this study – to define the peculiarities of the accounting policy formation at Lithuanian agricultural holdings- descriptive, logical analysis and synthesis, comparison, questioning, and graphical representation methods were employed. The relationship between accounting method application and profit increasing/decreasing accounting policy formation at agricultural holdings is analyzed. The study revealed that a holding with respect to accounting policy formed in relation to profit may choose different accounting methods according to different accounting objects. It follows from the empirical investigation carried out at Lithuanian Agricultural holdings that not all holdings acknowledge the role of the accounting policy and the relevance of its formation. The holdings that form the accounting policy do not look for the most favorable moment for the accounting policy formation. They refer to the normative theory. The empirical study of the tangible, inventory and biological assets, and liabilities with respect to accounting policy formation indicated that most of the Lithuanian agricultural holdings choose the profit increasing accounting policy.
Keyword(s): normative theory, positive theory, accounting policy formation, profit, assets, liabilities, accounting methods
Astami E. W. ir Tower G. (2006). Accounting-policy choice and firm characteristics in the Asia Pacific region: An international empirical test of Costly Contracting Theory // The International Journal of Accounting. – Vol. 41. – pp.1-21.
Dhaliwal D.S., Salamon G.L., Smith E.D. (1982). The effect of owner versus management control on the choice of accounting methods // Journal of Accounting and Economics. – Vol.4. – pp. 41-53.
Healy P.M. (1999). A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for Standard setting / P.M. Healy, L.M. Wahlen // Accounting Horizons., Vol. 13 (4). – pp. 365-383.
Henderson S., Peirson G. ir Brown R. (1993). Financial Accounting Theory. Its Nature and Development. – Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.
Holthausen R.W., Leftwich R.W. (1983). The economic consequences of accounting choice: Implications of costly contracting and monitoring // Journal of Accounting and Economics . – Vol. 5. – pp.77-117.
Hooks J.J., Perera H. (2006). The evaluation of annual reporting practices of an electricity firm. // Accounting Forum. – Vol. 30, Issue 2. – pp. 85 – 104.
Hope O.K. (2003). Accounting Policy Disclosures and Analyst‘s Forecasts. // Contemporary Accounting Research. – Vol. 20. No. 2. – pp. 295 – 321.
Iatridis G. (2006). Accounting disclosue and firms’ financial attributes: Evidence from the UK stock market. // International Review of Financial Analysis. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com
Jensen M.C. (1976). Reflections on the State of Accounting Research and the Regulation of Accounting // Stanford Lectures in Accounting. – Stanford University.
Jensen M.C. (1983). Organisation theory, accounting and methodology // Accounting Review. – Vol. 58(2). – pp. 319-339.
McKernan J., Dunn J. (2003). Reflection and the destruction of accounting knowledge. // Critical perspectives on accounting. – Vol. 14, Issue 4. – pp. 441 – 477.
Mouck T. (1990). Positive accounting theory as a Lakatosian research programme // Accounting and business research. – 20(79). pp. 231-239.
Riahi-Belkaoui A. (2000). Accounting theory. 4 ed. London: THOMSON Learning.
Rudžionienė K. (2004). Informacijos vartotojų poreikių poveikis pasirinkti įmonės finansinės apskaitos politiką (The Impact of Accounting Information Users’ Interests on Company’s Financial Accounting Policy Choice) // Ekonomika. – Nr. 67 (2). – pp. 73-84.
Rudžionienė K., Zinkevičienė D. (2004). Research of the Impact of Company’s Size on Financial Accounting Method Choice // Inžinerinė ekonomika. - Kaunas: Technologija. – Nr. 3 (38). - pp.14 – 19.
Rudžionienė K., Zinkevičienė D. (2005). Įmonės finansinio sverto poveikis finansinės apskaitos metodų pasirinkimui // Inžinerinė ekonomika. - Nr. 5(45). – Kaunas: Technologija. – pp. 25-30.
Ruland R.G. (1984). Duty, obligation, and responsibility in accounting policy making. // Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. - Vol. 3, Issue 3. – pp. 223 – 237.
Scott W.R. (2003). Financial accounting theory. 3rd ed. Toronto: Prentice Hall.
Stolowy H., Breton G. (2000). A framework for the classification of accounts manipulations // HEC Accounting & Management Control Working Paper, No. 708/2000.
Tinker A. M., Merino B.D. and Neimark M. D. (1982). The normative origins of positive theories: Ideology and accounting thought // Accounting, Organisations and Society. – Vol.7, Issue 2. – pp.167-200.
Vergoossen R.G.A. (1997). Changes in accounting policies and investment analysts’ fixation on accounting figures. // Accounting, Organiztions and Society. – Vol. 22, Issue 6. – pp. 589 – 607.
Watts R.L. ir Zimmerman J.L. (1986). Positive accounting theory. – Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Watts R.L., Zimmerman J.L. (1990). Positive accounting theory: A ten year perspective // The Accounting Review. – 65(1). – pp. 131-156.
Zmijewski M.E., Hagerman R.L. (1981). An income strategy approach to the positive theory of accounting standard set-ting/choice //Journal of Accounting and Economics. – Vol.3, Issue 2. – pp. 129-149.
- There are currently no refbacks.
Economics and Rural Development ISSN 1822-3346 / eISSN 2345-0347
This journal is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License. Responsible editors: Prof. Dr Vilija Alekneviciene, Dr Gunita Mazure.