Economics and Rural Development, Volume 10, Number 2

Valuation of Public Projects for Regional Development: Critical Approach

Jurgita Baranauskiene, Vilija Alekneviciene
Aleksandras Stulginskis University


Public projects for regional development are prepared and implemented in order to create social benefits for society of a particular region – to improve living and working conditions and/or to protect the environment. Every investment option should be evaluated and substantiated before the right investment decision is made. The valuation of public projects is complicated due to complexity of valuation of social benefits for the regional society. Expected impact of public project should effectively satisfy society needs. The methods for public projects’ evaluation should be chosen in critical approach. The aim of this methodological research is highlight the main problems of methods used for evaluation of public projects for regional development. This article provides main characteristic of public projects for regional development, reviews the methods used for evaluation of public projects for regional development, presents problematic questions of public projects’ evaluation raised in scientific literature, provides a summary of the main problems of evaluation methods used for regional development public projects.

Keyword(s): public project, social benefits, social discount rate, regional development


Alekneviciene V., Baranauskiene J. (2013). Rural Com-munities Public Project Valuation Using Cost-Benefit Analysis. Rural development 2013: the 6th international scientific conference proceedings. Vol. 6, book 1, pp. 25–31, Aleksandras Stulginskis University.

Almansa C., Calatrava J. (2007). Reconciling sustainability and discounting in Cost–Benefit Analysis: A methodo-logical proposal. Ecological economics, 60, pp. 712–725.

Almansa C., Martinez-Paz J.M. (2011). What Weight Should Be Assigned to Future Environmental Impacts? A Probabilistic Cost Benefit Analysis Using Recent Ad-vances on Discounting. Science of the Total Environment, 409, pp. 1305–1314.

Bateman I. J., Willis K.G. (Eds.) (1999). Valuing Environmental Preferences. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Bisdor R. (1999). Cognitive Support Methods for Multi-criteria Expert Decision Making. European Journal of Operational Research, 119, pp. 379–387.

Bleichrodt H., Quiggin J. (1999). Life-cycle Preferences over Consumption and Health: When is Cost-effectiveness Analysis Equivalent to Cost-benefit Analysis? Journal Health Economic, 18 (6), pp. 681–708.

Brukas V., Thorsen B. J., Helles F., Tarp P. (2001). Dis-count Rate and Harvest Policy: Implications for Baltic Forestry. Forest Policy and Economics, 2, pp. 143–156.

Chen J.(2012). The Nature of Discounting. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23, pp. 313–324.

Cordova M. L. (1985). Policy Planning Simulation for World Regional Development and Equity. Economics of Planning, 19 (2).

Frini A., Guitouni A., Martel J. M. (2012). A general decomposition approach for multicriteria decision trees. European Journal of Operational Research 220, pp. 452–460.

Ginevicius R. (2006). Daugiakriterinio Vertinimo Rodikliu Svoriu Nustatymas, Remiantis ju Tarpusavio Saveika. Multicriteria Evaluation of the Criteria Weights Based on Their Interrelationship. Verslas: teorija ir praktika, Business: theory and practice, 7(1), pp. 3–13.

Ginevicius R. (2009). Socioekonominiu sistemu bukles kiekybinio ivertinimo problematika. Some Problems of Quantitative Evaluation of the State of Social-economic Systems. Verslas: teorija ir praktika (Business: theory and practice), 10(2), pp. 69–83.

Ginevicius R., Podvezko V. (2008). Daugiakriterinio vertinimo taikymo galimybes kiekybiniam socialiniu reiskiniu vertinimui. A Feasibility Study of Multicriteria Methods’ Application to Quantitative Evaluation of Social Phenomena. Verslas: teorija ir praktika, Business: theory and practice, pp. 81–87.

Glazer A., Kanniainen V., Niskanen E. (2002). Bequests, Control Rights, and Cost–benefit Analysis. European Journal of Political Economy, 19, pp. 71–82.

Gollier Ch. (2002). Discounting an Uncertain Future. Journal of Public Economics, 85, pp. 149–166.

Gollier Ch. (2010). Ecological Discounting. Journal of Economic Theory, 145, pp. 812–829.

Greenberg D. H., Robins P. K. (2008). Incorporating Nonmarket Time into Benefit-cost Analyses of Social Programs: An Application to the Self–sufficiency Project. Journal of Public Economics, 92, pp. 766–794.

Guitouni A., Martel J. M. (1998). Tentative Guidelines to Help Choosing an Appropriate MCDA Method. European Journal of Operational Research, 109, pp. 501–521.

Hajkowicz S., Perraud J.M., Dawes, W., DeRose, R. (2005). The Strategic Landscape Investment Model: a Tool for Mapping Optimal Environmental Expenditure. Environmental Modelling & Software, 20, pp. 1251–1262.

Hanley N., Spash C.L. (1993). Cost-Benefit-Analysis and the Environment. Aldershot.

Hansjugen B. (2004). Economic Valuation through Cost-benefit Analysis – Possibilities and Limitations. Toxicol-ogy, 205, pp. 241–252

Hepburn C.J., Koundouri P. (2007). Recent Advances in Discounting: Implications for Forest Economics. Journal of Forest Economics, 13, pp. 169–189.

Hites R., De Smet Y., Risse N., Salazar-Neumann M., Vincke P. (2006) About the Applicability of MCDA to Some Robustness Problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 174, pp. 322–332.

Jacoby H. G. (2000). Access to Markets and the Benefits of Rural Roads. The Economic Journal, 110, pp. 713–737.

Karp L. (2005). Global Warming and Hyperbolic Dis-counting. Journal of Public Economics, 89, pp. 261–282.

Kazanovski A.D. (1968). A Standardized Approach to Cost-Effectiveness Evaluations, Wiley.

Liu L. (2003). A Marginal Cost of Funds Approach to Multi-period Public Project Evaluation: Implications for the Social Discount Rate. Journal of Public Economics, 87, pp. 1707–1718.

Mendoza G. A., Martins H. (2006) Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Natural Resource Management: A Critical Review of Methods and New Modelling Paradigms. Forest Ecology and Management, 230, pp. 1–22.

Nyborg K. (2000). Project Analysis as Input to Public Debate: Environmental Valuation Versus Physical Unit Indicators. Ecological Economics, 34, pp. 393–408.

Nooij M. (2011). Social Cost-benefit Analysis of Electricity Interconnector Investment: A Critical Appraisal. Energy Policy, 39, pp. 3096–3105.

Parks S., Gowdy J. (2013) What Have Economists Learned About Valuing Nature? A Review Essay. Ecosystem Services, 3, pp.1–10.

Price C. (2010). Low Discount Rates and Insignificant Environmental Values. Ecological Economics, 69, pp. 1895–1903.

Saez C. A., Requena J. C. (2007) Reconsiling Sustainabil-ity and Discounting in Cost-benefit Analysis: a Methodo-logical Proposal. Ecological economics, 60, pp. 712–725.

Shmelev S. E., Rodrkguez-Labajos B. (2009). Dynamic Multidimensional Assessment of Sustainability at the Macro Level: The Case of Austria. Ecological Economics, 68, pp. 2560–2573.

Simic N. Vratonjic V., Beric I. (2011). Methodologies for the Evaluation of Public Sector Investment Projects. Megatrend Review, 8(1), pp. 113–130.

Stern N. (1972). Experience with the Use of the Little/Mirrlees Method for an Appraisal of Small-holder Tea in Kenya. Oxford bulletin of economics and statistics (0305-9049), 34 (1), pp. 93.

Tamosiuniene R., Sidlauskas S., Trumpaite I. (2006). Investiciniu projektu efektyvumo daugiakriterinis vertinimas. The Multicriterial Evaluation Method of the Effectiveness of the Investment Projects. Verslas: teorija ir praktika (Business: theory and practice), 7(4): pp. 203–212.

Van de Walle D. (2002) Choosing Rural Road Investments to Help. The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA, S0305-750X(01)00127-9.

Zigern-Korn N. V. (2013). Russia’s Experience of Re-search of the Regional Development Potential. Regional Research of Russia, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 177–181.

Zilinskas V. J. (2009). Investiciniu projektu optimalios atrankos metodas. Optimal Selection Method for Investment Projects. Verslas, vadyba ir studijos. Vilnius: Technika, pp. 21–36.

Zopounidis C. (1999). Multicriteria Decision Aid in Financial Management. European Journal of Operational Research, 119, pp. 404–415.

Full Text: PDF



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Economics and Rural Development ISSN 1822-3346 / eISSN 2345-0347

This journal is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License. Responsible editors: Prof. Dr Vilija Alekneviciene, Dr Gunita Mazure.